Skip to main content
Home
Zeitschriften
Zeitungen
Podcast
Gesundheitspolitik
Praxis
Allerlei
Jobs
Fachgebiete
Allgemeinmedizin Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin Apotheke Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kinder & Jugendheilkunde Neurologie & Psychiatrie Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie Pflege Urologie Zahnmedizin
Subfächer Innere Medizin
Diabetologie Gastroenterologie Infektiologie Kardiologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Pneumologie Rheumatologie
Fortbildungen
Überblick Fortbildungen DFP-Literaturstudium-Artikel DFP-Webcast Fortbildungen DFP-Podcasts
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Surgery
Erschienen in:

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid- to lower rectal cancer

verfasst von: W.-S. Lee, MD,PhD,FACS, S. W. Park, MD, J.-H. Baek, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of clinical and anatomical features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can affect pelvic dissection time for treating mid- to lower rectal cancer.

Methods

A total of 90 consecutive male patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for mid- to lower rectal cancer were retrospectively assessed. MRI pelvimetry data were analyzed to identify anatomical features that could affect pelvic dissection time.

Results

Univariate analysis indicated that tumor distance from the anal verge (p = 0.001), preoperative chemoradiotherapy (p  = 0.002), and interspinous distance (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with pelvic dissection time.

Conclusion

Patients with a short interspinous distance may require a longer pelvic dissection time for treating rectal cancer by resection.
Vorheriger Artikel The impact of advanced age on short- and long-term results after surgery for colorectal cancer
Nächster Artikel Season and vitamin D status do not affect probability for surgical site infection after colorectal surgery
Literatur
1.
Hohenberger W. The effect of specialization or organization of rectal cancer surgery. In: Søreide PDO, Norstein DJ, editors. Rectal cancer surg. [Internet]. Berlin: Springer; 1997. S. 353–63.CrossRef
2.
Quirke P, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Couture J, et al. Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2009;373:821–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
MacFarlane JK, Ryall RDH, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1993;341:457–60.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJH, van der Worp E, Kapiteijn E, Quirke P, van Krieken JHJM, et al. Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1729–34.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Heald R, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1:1479–82.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G, Norman AR, Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31:1313–20.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Veenhof AAFA, Engel AF, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJHJ, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:469–75.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;146:483–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I, Yamato T, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: “narrow pelvis” is not a contraindication. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1907–12.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, Quirke P, Cairns A, Finan PJ, et al. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:232–40.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Stark DD, McCarthy SM, Filly RA, Parer JT, Hricak H, Callen PW. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:947–50.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, et al. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg. 2008;247:642–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid- to lower rectal cancer
verfasst von
W.-S. Lee, MD,PhD,FACS
S. W. Park, MD
J.-H. Baek, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-015-0354-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

The role of platelets and portal venous pressure fluctuations in postoperative liver regeneration

  • Review

Laparoscopic management of diaphragmatic mesothelial cysts in children

  • Case Report

Case–matched comparison of short and middle term survival after laparoscopic versus open rectal and rectosigmoid cancer surgery

  • Review

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing versus spirometry as predictors of cardiopulmonary complications after colorectal surgery

  • Original Article

Austrian expert panel recommendation for radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus

  • Original Article

High volume surgery, flood myths, cancer, and minions

  • Editorial