nach oben

20.01.2025 | Reproduktionsmedizin

Kryoembryotransfer im natürlichen Zyklus – Flexibilität und Risikovermeidung als neuer Standard

verfasst von: PD DDr. Michael Feichtinger

Erschienen in: Gynäkologie in der Praxis

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Auszug

International hat die Zahl an Kryoembryotransfers in den letzten 10 Jahren massiv zugenommen, während die Zahl an Frischembryotransfers tendenziell eher abgenommen hat. Der Kryoembryotransfer ist besonders bei jungen Patientinnen mit einer Reduktion von Überstimulationsbeschwerden und höheren Schwangerschaftsraten vergesellschaftet. …

Pereira MM, Mainigi M, Strauss JF (2021) Secretory products of the corpus luteum and preeclampsia. Hum Reprod Update 27(4):651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smith MC, Murdoch AP, Danielson LA, Conrad KP, Davison JM (2006) Relaxin has a role in establishing a renal response in pregnancy. fertil Steril 86(1):253–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.070CrossRefPubMed

von Versen-Hoynck F, Schaub AM, Chi YY et al (2019) Increased Preeclampsia risk and reduced aortic compliance with in vitro fertilization cycles in the absence of a corpus luteum. Hypertension 73(3):640–649. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12043CrossRef

Wiegel RE, Danser JAH, Steegers-Theunissen RPM et al (2020) Determinants of maternal renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system activation in early pregnancy: insights from 2 cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(11):3505–3517. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Zaat TR, Kostova EB, Korsen P, Showell MG, Mol F, van Wely M (2023) Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after natural versus artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer and the role of luteal phase support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 29(5):634–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Terho AM, Pelkonen S, Opdahl S et al (2021) High birth weight and large-for-gestational-age in singletons born after frozen compared to fresh embryo transfer, by gestational week: a Nordic register study from the CoNARTaS group. Hum Reprod 36(4):1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa304CrossRefPubMed

Ho VNA, Pham TD, Nguyen NT et al (2024) Livebirth rate after one frozen embryo transfer in ovulatory women starting with natural, modified natural, or artificial endometrial preparation in Viet Nam: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2(4):756–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736CrossRef

Zaat T, de Bruin JP, Goddijn M et al (2023) Home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfers in the Netherlands (Antarctica-2): an open-label, nationwide, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 402(10410):1312–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736CrossRef

Santos-Ribeiro S, Godinho CM, Nature R‑SS (2023) (almost) always prevails – challenging the status quo of artificial cycle frozen embryo transfers. Reprod Biomed Online 47(6):103352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103352CrossRefPubMed

10.

Zhang J, Liu H, Wang Y et al (2019) Letrozole use during frozen embryo transfer cycles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. fertil Steril 112(2):371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.014CrossRefPubMed

11.

Zhang J, Wei M, Bian X et al (2021) Letrozole-induced frozen embryo transfer cycles are associated with a lower risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 225(1):59 e1–59 e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.024CrossRefPubMed

12.

Labarta E, Mariani G, Rodriguez-Varela C, Bosch E (2022) Individualized luteal phase support normalizes live birth rate in women with low progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer in artificial endometrial preparation cycles. fertil Steril 117(1):96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.040CrossRefPubMed

13.

Lawrenz B, Ata B, Kalafat E et al (2023) Are systemic progesterone levels in true natural cycle euploid frozen embryo transfers with luteal phase support predictive for ongoing pregnancy rates? Hum Reprod 38(7):1318–1324. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead104CrossRefPubMed

14.

Saupstad M, Bergenheim SJ, Bogstad JW et al (2024) Progesterone concentrations on blastocyst transfer day in modified natural cycle frozen embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 49(1):103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103862CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Kryoembryotransfer im natürlichen Zyklus – Flexibilität und Risikovermeidung als neuer Standard
verfasst von: PD DDr. Michael Feichtinger
Publikationsdatum: 20.01.2025
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Gynäkologie in der Praxis
Print ISSN: 3005-0758
Elektronische ISSN: 3005-0766
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41974-024-00351-9

Springer Medizin Österreich

Auszug

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten