Open Access 31.01.2025 | short review
Endometrial cancer—news from ASCO 2024
Erschienen in: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2025
Summary
At the ASCO 2024, four clinically very important abstracts in endometrial cancer were presented. Long-term survival for primary hormonal therapy in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I disease versus primary surgery that were included in the National Cancer Database was reported. All had grade 1 or 2 endometrioid cancer and were between 18 and 49 years of age. They either received primary hysterectomy or primary hormonal therapy. In patients < 40 years, no difference in survival was found between the two groups. However, patients between 40 and 49 years of age who received primary hormonal therapy showed a significantly inferior survival compared to the hysterectomy group (10-year survival of 97% versus 79%, respectively). The SIENDO study reported the long-term follow-up of selinexor maintenance in patients with TP53 wild-type (wt) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who previously achieved remission following taxane–carboplatin chemotherapy. Selinexor inhibits XPO1 which is a multiclient nuclear exporter. Women received either selinexor 80 mg PO weekly or placebo. The median progression-free survival in the selinexor and the placebo group was 28 months versus 5 months, respectively (HR 0.44; p = 0.0005). Selinexor resulted in more grade ≥ 3 toxicities: 13% nausea, 3% vomiting, 4% diarrhea, 5% asthenia, 8% fatigue, 10% thrombocytopenia, 20% neutropenia, and 7% anemia. In a phase II study in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) endometrial cancer, combined vibostolimab and pembrolizumab resulted in complete and partial remissions in 13 and 53% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 immune-mediated adverse events included severe skin reactions, adrenal insufficiency, pneumonitis, and hypophysitis. A phase II study of fulvestrant plus abemaciclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced endometrial cancer resulted in partial remission in 44% and stable disease in 20% of the 27 patients, respectively.
At the annual ASCO Congress in Chicago 2024, several important abstracts on endometrial cancer were presented. Four of them have been selected for this article.
Long-term survival outcomes for hormonal therapy in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer were investigated [1]. The cohort comprised patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer included in the National Cancer Database. Patients were excluded from analysis in the case of discrepancies in AJCC clinical TNM stage, if diagnosis was not confirmed pathologically, if patients underwent radiation or chemotherapy prior to hysterectomy or hormonal therapy, or if they had unclassified endometrioid cancer. All patients were diagnosed between 2004 and 2020, had grade 1 or 2 endometrioid cancer, and were between 18 and 49 years of age. They either received primary hysterectomy or primary hormonal therapy. The latter cohort comprised around 5% of patients overall. In the group of patients less than 40 years, no difference in survival was found between those who had received primary hysterectomy or primary hormonal therapy (10-year survival of 97% versus 96%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR] 1.0), while patients between 40 and 49 years of age who received primary hormonal therapy showed a significantly inferior survival compared to the hysterectomy group (10-year survival of 97% versus 79%, respectively; HR 4.94). Thus, patients who wish to preserve fertility may be offered primary hormonal therapy instead of undergoing primary surgery. However, in this study the number of patients who received primary hormonal therapy was as low as 5%. Further analysis of the dataset is necessary to confirm that primary hormonal therapy can be considered safe in young patients who desire fertility preservation despite the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Anzeige
The long-term follow-up of selinexor maintenance in patients with TP53 wild-type (wt) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer was reported and a prespecified subgroup analysis from the phase 3 ENGOT-EN5/GOG-3055/SIENDO study was presented [2]. Selinexor inhibits XPO1 which is a multiclient nuclear exporter. TP53 is a well-recognized prognostic marker for endometrial cancer; 50% of advanced or recurrent endometrial cancers are TP53 wt, and about 40–55% are both TP53wt and mismatch-repair proficient (pMMR). A total of 263 patients with stage IV or first relapse of endometrial cancer were enrolled in this study. All had previously received ≥ 12 weeks of taxane–carboplatin therapy which had had resulted in partial or complete remission according to RECIST criteria. After remission, patients received either selinexor 80 mg PO weekly or placebo. Patients with a BMI < 20 kg/m2 received a dose of 60 mg PO weekly instead. In this phase III study, detailed molecular subclassification assessed by DNA and immunohistochemistry was performed. The subgroup of patients with TP53wt tumors was analyzed. The median age was 64 versus 62 years in the selinexor group (n = 77) and the placebo group (n = 36), respectively. ECOG performance status was 0–1 in 98% and 100%, respectively. The majority of patients (84% versus 81%) had endometrioid tumors. Four versus 8% of patients had serous cancers and 53% versus 50% had recurrent disease, respectively. Complete remission before the start of selinexor therapy was achieved in 40% versus 47%, respectively, while partial remission was reported in 60% and 53% of women, respectively. MMR deficiency was reported in 26% versus 25%, respectively. At a median follow-up period of 36.8 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in the selinexor and the placebo group was 28 months versus 5 months, respectively (HR 0.44; p = 0.0005). A significantly more favorable median PFS was also found for selinexor in the subgroup of patients with TP53wt/pMMR (40 months versus 5 months, respectively; HR 0.36; p = 0.0011). Preliminary overall survival analysis showed a trend towards improved survival in the subgroup of patients with selinexor in both the TP53wt and the TP53wt/pMMR subgroup. Compared to placebo, selinexor resulted in more grade ≥ 3 toxicities: 13% nausea, 3% vomiting, 4% diarrhea, 5% asthenia, 8% fatigue, 10% thrombocytopenia, 20% neutropenia, and 7% anemia. Although the data from this SIENDO substudy are quite convincing, further prospective data in the p53wt population are urgently needed. The current ENGOT-EN20 study prospectively investigates selinexor maintenance therapy after chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel for participants with p53wt, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
A phase II study in advanced previously treated mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer patients exclusively investigated vibostolimab coadministered with pembrolizumab (KEYVIBE 005-study; [3]). Vibostolimab is a humanized IgG 1 anti-TIGIT antibody that engages Fcy receptors on myeloid cells. In combination with pembrolizumab, vibostolimab had previously shown significant activity in melanoma and nonsmall cell cancer of the lung. The 40 patients had an ECOG status between 0 and 1 and showed disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy or ≤ 2 lines if the first was given in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. No prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy was allowed. The dose of vibostolimab was 200 mg and that of pembrolizumab was 200 mg IV every 3 weeks. In all, 13 and 53% of patients, respectively, showed complete or partial remission. A further 20% of women showed disease stabilization. Median PFS was 15 months, while median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Grade 3 or 4 immune-mediated adverse events included severe skin reactions, adrenal insufficiency, pneumonitis, and hypophysitis. Especially the toxicity seen in this study questions whether this combination will significantly add to the armamentarium of systemic therapy in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) endometrial cancer.
A phase II study of fulvestrant plus abemaciclib in hormone-receptor positive advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer was carried out [4]. Of the 27 patients, 89% had endometroid cancer, the majority of them being graded 1 or 2 (84%). In all, 96% of tumors were estrogen receptor-positive. All patients had received 1 (48%) or 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. 41% of patients had prior hormone treatment. No complete response was found, while partial response occurred in 44% and stable disease in 20%, respectively. The median duration of response was 16 months.
Clinically valuable study data were presented at ASCO 2024. Particularly data from selinexor maintenance in p53wt endometrial cancer were encouraging. In addition, there now exists some evidence that primary hormonal therapy with a CDK4/6-inhibitor may be a valuable option for patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer who are less than 40 years of age and who desire fertility preservation.
Anzeige
Take home message
Selinexor may be valuable option for patients with metastatic p53 wild type endometrial cancer. Primary hormonal treatment may be safe in early endometrial cancer patients < 40 years.
E. Petru: Honorary for advisory boards and lecture fees from Novartis. M. Schinnerl declares that she has no competing interests. V. Kolovetsiou: Honorary for lecture fees from Novartis.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.