Skip to main content
Home
Zeitschriften
Zeitungen
Podcast
Gesundheitspolitik
Praxis
Allerlei
Jobs
Fachgebiete
Allgemeinmedizin Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin Apotheke Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kinder & Jugendheilkunde Neurologie & Psychiatrie Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie Pflege Urologie Zahnmedizin
Subfächer Innere Medizin
Diabetologie Gastroenterologie Infektiologie Kardiologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Pneumologie Rheumatologie
Fortbildungen
Überblick Fortbildungen DFP-Literaturstudium-Artikel DFP-Webcast Fortbildungen DFP-Podcasts
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology
Erschienen in:

01.09.2015 | comment

Notes on breast cancer prevention and screening

verfasst von: Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Hans-Peter Köst, MD

Erschienen in: memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Auszug

Female breast cancer is one of the most dreaded neoplasms and connected with a high death rate [1‐4]. The risk for breast cancer can be diminished within limits by avoiding tobacco products and by observing weight control [5]. Also, alcohol consumption has been consistently associated with an increased risk for breast cancer [6, 7]. Another parameter is diet; vegetables, fruits and whole grains should constitute its central part [5]. Further, non-dietary risk factors for breast cancer are hormone replacement therapy for menopausal symptoms and ionizing radiation (e.g. from radiation therapy of cancer) [8]. A moderate to vigorous physical activity has been shown to be associated with a breast cancer risk decrease of approximately 25 % among women who are more active versus less active women [9]. …
Vorheriger Artikel A 59-year-old patient with somatic type malignancy as a relapse of testicular tumor after 28 years
Literatur
1.
Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2014. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2014, p. 8, 132, ISSN 0835–2976.
2.
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figs. 2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014. p 68.
3.
Amtliche Todesursachenstatistik, Wiesbaden. Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesundheit. Todesursachen in Deutschland, Fachserie 12 Reihe 4. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2013. p 53.
4.
Krebs in Deutschland. 2009/2010. Robert Koch-Institut, Herausgeber und die Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen, 9. Ausgabe. Berlin: Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V, Herausgeber; 2013. pp. 16–17.
5.
Kushi LH, Doyle C, McCullough M, Rock CL, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bandera EV, Gapstur S, Patel AV, Andrews K, Gansler T, The American Cancer Society 2010 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. American cancer society guidelines on nutrition and physical activity for cancer prevention. Reducing the risk of cancer with healthy food choices and physical activity. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:30–67.CrossRefPubMed
6.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington, DC: World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
7.
8.
Baum M. Harms from breast cancer screening outweigh benefits if death caused by treatment is included. BMJ 2013; 346:f385. doi:10.1136/bmj.f385.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Norat T, Chan D, Lau R, Vieira R. The associations between food, nutrition and physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. WCRF/AICR systematic literature review continuous update project report. London: World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research; 2008.
10.
Tomasetti C, Vogelstein B. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science. 2015;347:78–81.CrossRefPubMed
11.
American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2013.
12.
Marmot MG, Altman DG, Cameron DA, Dewar JA, Thompson SG, Wilcox M. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. BJC. 2013;108:2205–40. doi:10. 1038/bjc.2013.177.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ. 2014;348:g366. doi:10.1 136/bmj.g366.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Parvinen I, Heinävaara S, Anttila A, Helenius H, Klemi P, Pylkkänen L. Mammography screening in three Finnish residential areas: comprehensive population- based study of breast cancer incidence and incidence-based mortality 1976–2009.Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2205–40. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.177.CrossRef
15.
16.
17.
Welch HG. Over-diagnosis and mammography screening. BMJ. 2009;339:182–3.CrossRef
18.
Elmore JG, Harris RP. The harms and benefits of modern screening mammography. BMJ. 2014;348:g3824. doi:10.1136/bmj.g3824.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Notes on breast cancer prevention and screening
verfasst von
Dr. med. Dr. rer. nat. Hans-Peter Köst, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2015
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1865-5041
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-5076
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-015-0218-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Changing treatment paradigms in lymphoma: new targets and new drugs

  • short review

Indolent lymphoma at ASH 2014: new kids on the block (iDrugs)

  • short review

A 59-year-old patient with somatic type malignancy as a relapse of testicular tumor after 28 years

  • Case report

Prognostic factors and their correlation with staging in patients with multiple myeloma: a single centre study in North India

  • original report

ASH 2014 update: Myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia

  • short review

ASH 2014: novel strategies in the management of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma

  • short review