nach oben

Erschienen in:

Open Access 03.11.2020 | main topic

Robotic surgery for thoracic surgery

verfasst von: Tim Sandhaus, Marion Durand, Thorben Möller, Jan‑Hendrik Egberts, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Steinert

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Indications for the use of RATS vary between the facilities but correspond as far as possible to other minimally invasive surgical findings. In general, RATS is currently a therapeutic option for the management of early-stage NSCLC without mediastinal lymph node involvement in oncological surgery, although depending on the planned intervention and the surgical facility, hilar lymph node involvement may be accepted

Vorheriger Artikel Robotic resection for esophageal cancer

Nächster Artikel Robotic liver surgery—advantages and limitations

Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:366–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026.CrossRefPubMed

Whitson BA, Andrade RSM, Boettcher A, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favorable than thoracotomy for resection of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1965–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.049.CrossRefPubMed

Villamizar NR, Darrabie MD, Burfeind WR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared with thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:419–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.026.CrossRefPubMed

Melfi FM, Menconi GF, Mariani AM, et al. Early experience with robotic technology for thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;21:864–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00102-1.CrossRefPubMed

Park BJ, Melfi F, Mussi A, et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:383–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.055.CrossRefPubMed

Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, et al. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:236–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117.CrossRefPubMed

Louie BE, Wilson JL, Kim S, et al. Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer using the society of thoracic surgeons database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:917–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.032.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yang HX, Woo M, Sima CS, et al. Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;265:431–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001708.CrossRefPubMed

Sandhaus T, Lübke A, Möller T, et al. Roboter-assistierte Thoraxchirurgie. Eine weitere endoskopische Operationsmöglichkeit. CHAZ. 2019;20:279–85.

10.

Meccariello G, Faedi F, AlGhamdi S, et al. An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback? J Robot Surg. 2016;10:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-015-0541-0.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Möller T, Egberts J‑H, et al. Current status and evolution of robotic-associated thoracic surgery in Germany—results from a nationwide survey. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(11):4807–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Louie BE, Farivar AS, Aye RW, et al. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1598–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.067.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Swanson SJ, Herndon JE, D’Amico TA, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802—a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:4993–7.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kneuertz PJ, Singer E, D’Souza DM, et al. Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: a propensity score–weighted comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:2018–2026.e2.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Li J‑T, Liu P‑Y, Huang J, et al. Perioperative outcomes of radical lobectomies using robotic-assisted thoracoscopic technique vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic technique: retrospective study of 1,075 consecutive p‑stage I non-small cell lung cancer cases. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11:882–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Learning curve associated with VATS lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:47–50. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2012.04.05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Cheufou DH, Mardanzai K, Ploenes T, et al. Effectiveness of robotic lobectomy-outcome and learning curve in a high volume center. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67:573–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1639477.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Power AD, D’Souza DM, Moffatt-Bruce SD, et al. Defining the learning curve of robotic surgery: what does it take? Surg Endosc. 2019;33:3880–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07035-y.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Durand M, Dabboura E, et al. Four-arm robotic lung resection versus muscle-sparing mini-thoracotomy; retrospective experience. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(4):1433–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Cerfolio R, Louie BE, Farivar AS, et al. Consensus statement on definitions and nomenclature for robotic thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154:1065–9.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Durand M. Four-arm robotic sleeve right upper lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;8(2):286–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Robotic surgery for thoracic surgery
verfasst von: Tim Sandhaus
Marion Durand
Thorben Möller
Jan‑Hendrik Egberts
Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Matthias Steinert
Publikationsdatum: 03.11.2020
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: European Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00674-9

Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques

main topic

Complete mesocolic excision in minimally invasive surgery of colonic cancer: do we need the robot?

Open Access
main topic

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—will robotic surgery be the future?

Open Access
main topic

Surgery reunites the world for the benefit of our health

editorial

Robotic repair of lateral incisional hernias using intraperitoneal onlay, preperitoneal, and retromuscular mesh placement: a comparison of mid-term results and surgical technique

original article

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences

main topic

Springer Medizin Österreich

Robotic surgery for thoracic surgery

Summary

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques

Complete mesocolic excision in minimally invasive surgery of colonic cancer: do we need the robot?

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—will robotic surgery be the future?

Surgery reunites the world for the benefit of our health

Robotic repair of lateral incisional hernias using intraperitoneal onlay, preperitoneal, and retromuscular mesh placement: a comparison of mid-term results and surgical technique

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences

Springer Medizin Österreich

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques

Complete mesocolic excision in minimally invasive surgery of colonic cancer: do we need the robot?

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—will robotic surgery be the future?

Surgery reunites the world for the benefit of our health

Robotic repair of lateral incisional hernias using intraperitoneal onlay, preperitoneal, and retromuscular mesh placement: a comparison of mid-term results and surgical technique

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences