Skip to main content
Home
Zeitschriften
Zeitungen
Podcast
Gesundheitspolitik
Praxis
Allerlei
Jobs
Fachgebiete
Allgemeinmedizin Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin Apotheke Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kinder & Jugendheilkunde Neurologie & Psychiatrie Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie Pflege Urologie Zahnmedizin
Subfächer Innere Medizin
Diabetologie Gastroenterologie Infektiologie Kardiologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Pneumologie Rheumatologie
Fortbildungen
Überblick Fortbildungen DFP-Literaturstudium-Artikel DFP-Webcast Fortbildungen DFP-Podcasts
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Erschienen in:

01.05.2013 | main topic

Surgical management of osteoarthritis


verfasst von: Benedikt Proffen, MD, Patrick Vavken, MD, Ronald Dorotka, MD

Erschienen in: Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift | Ausgabe 9-10/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

The last few years have witnessed significant advancements in arthroplasty. The procedure is mainly used to treat osteoarthritis of the hip and knee joint. Other joints such as the shoulder or ankle are also being successfully replaced by arthroplasty. The success of the operation depends on the implantation technique as well as the choice of material and fixation technique. Excellent results have been achieved especially in hip arthroplasty, with long-term survival rates of 90 %. However, the potential complications and sequelae are also worthy of mention, although they concern just a fraction of the treated patients. Careful preoperative planning, informing the patient accurately about the chances of success, and discussing the patient’s expectations are essential aspects of the treatment.
Vorheriger Artikel Pharmacologic treatment of hand-, knee- and hip-osteoarthritis
Nächster Artikel Erratum to: Fingolimod in the treatment algorithm of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a statement of the Central and East European (CEE) MS Expert Group
Literatur
1.
Kotz R, Chiari C, Hofstaetter JG, Lunzer A, Peloschek P. Long-term experience with Chiari’s osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(9):2215–20.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Brouwer RW, Raaij van TM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhagen AP, Jakma TS, Verhaar JA. Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, Issue3.Art.No.:CD004019.DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004019.pub3
3.
Mont MA, Stuchin SA, Paley D, Sharkey PF, Parvisi J, Tria AJ Jr., et al. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies. Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:265–83.PubMed
4.
Efe T, Heyse TJ, Boese C, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J, et al. TKA following high tibial osteotomy versus primary TKA—a matched pair analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:207.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):261–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(1):2–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Gioia AR, Plakseychuk A, Levison T, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18(2):123–8.CrossRef
8.
AAHKS. Minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement. 2005 (cited; Available from: http://​www.​aahks.​org/​patients/​resources/​MIS_​Patients.​pdf)

9.
Vavken P, Dorotka R. Modeling the “minimally invasive surgery effect” in total joint replacement. Surgical Innovation. 2011 Sep;18(3):268–78.
10.
Kastner N, Gruber G, Aigner BA, Friesenbichler J, Pechmann M, Furst F, et al. Sex-related outcome differences after implantation of low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012;36(7):1393–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Bourne R. A gender-specific prosthesis was similar to a standard prosthesis in women having total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(4):396.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Song EK, Jung WB, Yoon TR, Park KS, Seo HY, Seon JK. Comparison of outcomes after bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty using gender-specific and unisex knees. J Arthroplasty. 2011;27(2):226–31.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Thomsen MG, Husted H, Bencke J, Curtis D, Holm G, Troelsen A. Do we need a gender-specific total knee replacement? A randomized controlled trial comparing a high-flex and a gender-specific posterior design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(6):787–92.PubMed
14.
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–54.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med. 2004;117(8):556–62.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Januel JM, Chen G, Ruffieux C, Quan H, Douketis JD, Crowther MA, et al. Symptomatic in-hospital deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism following hip and knee arthroplasty among patients receiving recommended prophylaxis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(3):294–303.PubMedCrossRef
17.
18.
Caton J, Prudhon JL. Over 25 years survival after Charnley’s total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):185–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Callaghan JJ, Bracha P, Liu SS, Piyaworakhun S, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of 35 years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(11):2617–21.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, et al. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1614–20.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A, Richardson JB. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(10):1344–50.PubMed
22.
Henderson RA, Lachiewicz PF. Groin pain after replacement of the hip: aetiology, evaluation and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(2):145–51.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Jafari SM, Coyle C, Mortazavi SM, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J. Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(8):2046–51.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Rubash HE, Pagnano MW. Navigation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 5):17.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Vavken P, Kotz R, Dorotka R. Minimally invasive hip replacement—a meta-analysis. Z Orthop Unfall. 2007;145(2):152–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Husted H, Hansen HC, Holm G, Bach-Dal C, Rud K, Andersen KL, et al. Length of stay in total hip and knee arthroplasty in Danmark I: volume, morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. A national survey in orthopedic departments in Denmark. Ugeskr Laeger. 2006;168(22):2139–43.PubMed
28.
Husted H, Otte KS, Kristensen BB, Orsnes T, Kehlet H. Readmissions after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(9):1185–91.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Jorgensen CC, Kehlet H, Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Fast-track Hip, Knee Replacement collaborative group. Outcomes in smokers and alcohol users after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013.
30.
von Roth P, Perka C, Dirschedl K, Mayr HO, Ensthaler L, Preininger B, et al. Use of Redon drains in primary total hip arthroplasty has no clinically relevant benefits. Orthopedics. 2012;35(11):e1592–5.CrossRef
31.
Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS. Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(2):156–61.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kumar S, Penematsa S, Parekh S. Are drains required following a routine primary total joint arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2007;31(5):593–6.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Niskanen RO, Korkala OL, Haapala J, Kuokkanen HO, Kaukonen JP, Salo SA. Drainage is of no use in primary uncomplicated cemented hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(5):567–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Burgers PT, Van Geene AR, Van den Bekerom MP, Van Lieshout EM, Blom B, Aleem IS, et al. Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials. Int Orthop. 2012;36(8):1549–60.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Gao H, Liu Z, Xing D, Gong M. Which is the best alternative for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(6):1782–91.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Heetveld MJ, Rogmark C, Frihagen F, Keating J. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: what is the evidence? J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(6):395–402.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Parker MJ, Gurusamy K. Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD001708.
38.
Amanatullah DF, Cheung Y, Di Cesare PE. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010;41(2):263–72.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Fowble VA, Schuh A, Hoke R, Bitsch RG, Beaule PE. Clinical correlation of femoral component migration in hip resurfacing arthroplasty analyzed by Einzel-Bild-Rontgen-analyze-femoral component analysis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(2):243–50.PubMedCrossRef
40.
McMinn D, Daniel J, Pynsent P, Pradhan C, Ziaee H. Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. CORR. 2005;441:91–8.CrossRef
41.
Stulberg BN, Trier KK, Naughton M, Zadzilka JD. Results and lessons learned from a United States hip resurfacing investigational device exemption trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 3):21–6.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Dettoni F, Bonasia DE, Castoldi F, Bruzzone M, Blonna D, Rossi R. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:131–40.PubMed
43.
Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D, Wefer A. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7–10 year follow-up prospective randomized study. Knee. 2001;8(3):187–94.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Fu Y, Wang G, Fu Q. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(9):1460–6.PubMedCrossRef
45.
He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee. 2010 Jun;18(3):137–44.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Pilling RW, Moulder E, Allgar V, Messner J, Sun Z, Mohsen A. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;94(24):2270–8.CrossRef
47.
Vavken P, Gruber M, Dorotka R. Outcomes after minimally invasive total knee replacement—a meta-analysis. Z Orthop Unfall. 2008;146(6):768–72.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, Szabo RM. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;93(24):2249–54.CrossRef
49.
Vavken P, Sadoghi P, von Keudell A, Rosso C, Valderrabano V, Muller AM. Rates of radiolucency and loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty with pegged or keeled glenoid components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(3):215–21.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Kempf JF, Boileau P, Nemoz C, Walch G. The influence of rotator cuff disease on the results of shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: results of a multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(12):2240–8.PubMed
51.
Godeneche A, Boileau P, Favard L, Le Huec JC, Levigne C, Nove-Josserand L, et al. Prosthetic replacement in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder: early results of 268 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(1):11–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Norris TR, Iannotti JP. Functional outcome after shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(2):130–5.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Minimum 15 year follow-up of Neer hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 50 years or younger. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(6):604–13.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Ek ET, Neukom L, Catanzaro S, Gerber C. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after 5–15 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(4):e 1–5.
55.
Ramirez MA, Ramirez J, Murthi AM. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for irreparable rotator cuff tears and cuff tear arthropathy. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(4):749–59.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Shafritz AB, Flieger S. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: early results of 41 cases and a review of the literature. Hand Clin. 2012;28(4):469–79.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Jones KJ, Dines DM, Gulotta L, Dines JS. Management of proximal humerus fractures utilizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6(1):63–70.PubMedCrossRef
58.
Ortmaier R, Resch H, Matis N, Blocher M, Auffarth A, Mayer M, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in revision of failed shoulder arthroplasty-outcome and follow-up. Int Orthop. 2012;37(1):67–75.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Berth A, Pap G. Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;14(1):31–7.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B, Group T. Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years’ follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(6):847–52.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Huch K, Kuettner KE, Dieppe P. Osteoarthritis in ankle and knee joints. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1997;26(4):667–74.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, Valderrabano V. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(4):850–8.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Hintermann B, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Barg A. Total ankle replacement for treatment of end-stage osteoarthritis in elderly patients. J Aging Res. 2012;2012:345237.PubMed
64.
Barg A, Elsner A, Hefti D, Hintermann B. Total ankle arthroplasty in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;469(5):1427–35.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Barg A, Pagenstert GI, Leumann AG, Muller AM, Henninger HB, Valderrabano V. Treatment of the arthritic valgus ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):647–63.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Barg A, Knupp M, Anderson AE, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in obese patients: component stability, weight change, and functional outcome in 118 consecutive patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;32(10):925–32.CrossRef
67.
Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, Valderrabano V. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92 (Suppl 1) Pt 1:55–66.PubMed
68.
Barg A, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Zwicky L, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement using HINTEGRA, an unconstrained, three-component system: surgical technique and pitfalls. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):607–35.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):57–68.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. Two hundred and fifty-seven ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(5):575–83.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Bernardino S. Total elbow arthroplasty: history, current concepts, and future. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(11):1217–21.PubMedCrossRef
72.
73.
Ali A, Shahane S, Stanley D. Total elbow arthroplasty for distal humeral fractures: indications, surgical approach, technical tips, and outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(2 Suppl):53–8.PubMedCrossRef
74.
Antuna SA, Laakso RB, Barrera JL, Espiga X, Ferreres A. Linked total elbow arthroplasty as treatment of distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012;78(4):465–72.PubMed
75.
Ducrot G, Ehlinger M, Adam P, Di Marco A, Clavert P, Bonnomet F. Complex fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: is primary total elbow arthroplasty a valid treatment alternative? A series of 20 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(1):10–20.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Jenkins PJ, Watts AC, Norwood T, Duckworth AD, Rymaszewski LA, McEachan JE. Total elbow replacement: outcome of 1,146 arthroplasties from the Scottish Arthroplasty Project. Acta Orthop. 2013.
77.
Little CP, Graham AJ, Carr AJ. Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature in the English language until the end of 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):437–44.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical management of osteoarthritis

verfasst von
Benedikt Proffen, MD
Patrick Vavken, MD
Ronald Dorotka, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift / Ausgabe 9-10/2013
Print ISSN: 0043-5341
Elektronische ISSN: 1563-258X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-013-0199-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9-10/2013

Radiological aspects of osteoarthritis

  • themenschwerpunkt

Erratum to: Fingolimod in the treatment algorithm of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a statement of the Central and East European (CEE) MS Expert Group

  • Erratum

Pharmacologic treatment of hand-, knee- and hip-osteoarthritis

  • main topic

Osteoarthritis: physical medicine and rehabilitation—nonpharmacological management

  • themenschwerpunkt

Osteoarthritis: histology and pathogenesis

  • main topic

Osteoarthritis

  • Editorial