Skip to main content
Home
Zeitschriften
Zeitungen
Podcast
Gesundheitspolitik
Praxis
Allerlei
Jobs
Fachgebiete
Allgemeinmedizin Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin Apotheke Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kinder & Jugendheilkunde Neurologie & Psychiatrie Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie Pflege Urologie Zahnmedizin
Subfächer Innere Medizin
Diabetologie Gastroenterologie Infektiologie Kardiologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Pneumologie Rheumatologie
Fortbildungen
Überblick Fortbildungen DFP-Literaturstudium-Artikel DFP-Webcast Fortbildungen DFP-Podcasts
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
European Surgery
Erschienen in:

01.04.2013 | Original Scientific Paper

When to repair ischemic mitral valve regurgitation? An algorithmic approach

verfasst von: F. Roshanali, MD, A. Vedadian, MD, S. Shoar, MD, S. Sandoughdaran, MD, M. Naderan, M. H. Mandegar, MD

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Despite huge progress in the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation, there is still controversy regarding the ideal treatment option.

Aims

Our study aimed to define an algorithmic approach in order to select those patients who will benefit the most from concomitant mitral valve procedure.

Methods

Patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) who met the inclusion criteria were included in our study. Patients with structural MR including ruptured chordae or papillary muscle, abnormal leaflet thickening, annular calcification, or other valvular or congenital heart diseases, ventricular aneurysms and those who were candidates for other surgical procedures were excluded. A total of 350 patients (about 12 %) were classified as having ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) and were enrolled in our analysis. All the patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and by the designed algorithmic approach were also decided to have additive procedures for their concomitant IMR.

Results

Six months survival was 91.5 % among all the patients in this study. During the follow-ups 86.9 % of the patients survived . Overall mortality rate was 13.1 % (n = 46), of which 7.1 % (n = 25) occurred due to cardiac and 6 % (n = 21) as a result of a non-cardiac cause.

Conclusion

Individualising methods to select patients suffering from IMR for concomitant mitral valve procedure and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) seems to serves more effectively by reducing unnecessary surgeries and at the same time not missing absolute indications for concomitant valve repairs. Our algorithm showed a promising efficacy to effectively select patients for CABG and concomitant mitral valve procedures.
Vorheriger Artikel Impact of resection techniques on postoperative lung function parameters in pulmonary metastasectomy
Nächster Artikel Long-term survival after hand-assisted laparoscopic approach of primary retroperitoneal mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in male: case report and review of literature
Literatur
1.
Filsoufi F, Salzberg S, Adams D. Current management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005;72:105–15.PubMed
2.
Micovic S, Milacic P, Otasevic P, et al. Comparison of valve annuloplasty and replacement for ischemic mitral valve incompetence. Heart Surg Forum. 2008;11:E340–E5.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Ellis SG, Whitlow PL, Raymond RE, Schneider JP. Impact of mitral regurgitation on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(3):315–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103(13):1759–64.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Grossi EA, Crooke GA, DiGiorgi PL, Schwartz CF, Jorde U, Applebaum RM, et al. Impact of moderate functional mitral insufficiency in patients undergoing surgical revascularization. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I573–6.PubMed
6.
Hickey MS, Smith LR, Muhlbaier LH, Harrell FE, Jr., Reves JG, Hinohara T, et al. Current prognosis of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Implications for future management. Circulation. 1988;78(3 Pt 2):I51–9.
7.
Tcheng JE, Jackman JD, Jr., Nelson CL, Gardner LH, Smith LR, Rankin JS, et al. Outcome of patients sustaining acute ischemic mitral regurgitation during myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(1):18–24.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Borger MA, Alam A, Murphy PM, Doenst T, David TE. Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: repair, replace or rethink? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):1153–61.
9.
Condado JA, Velez-Gimon M. Catheter-based approach to mitral regurgitation. J Interv Cardiol. 2003;16(6):523–34.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Christenson JT, Simonet F, Bloch A, Maurice J, Velebit V, Schmuziger M. Should a mild to moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation in patients with poor left ventricular function be repaired or not? J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(5):484–8; discussion 8–9.
10.
Duarte IG, Shen Y, MacDonald MJ, Jones EL, Craver JM, Guyton RA. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone: late results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(2):426–30.
12.
Tolis GA, Jr., Korkolis DP, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Revascularization alone (without mitral valve repair) suffices in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5):1476–80; discussion 80–1.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Aklog L, Filsoufi F, Flores KQ, Chen RH, Cohn LH, Nathan NS, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation? Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):I68–75.
14.
Srivastava AR, Banerjee A, Jacob S, Dunning J. Should patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with mild to moderate ischaemic mitral regurgitation also undergo mitral valve repair or replacement? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(4):538–46.
15.
Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, Bishay ES, Cosgrove DM, White J, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1125–41.
16.
Al-Radi OO, Austin PC, Tu JV, David TE, Yau TM. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(4):1260–7; discussion −7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Milano CA, Daneshmand MA, Rankin JS, Honeycutt E, Williams ML, Swaminathan M, et al. Survival prognosis and surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(3):735–44.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Magne J, Girerd N, Senechal M, Mathieu P, Dagenais F, Dumesnil JG, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of short-term and long-term survival. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S104–11.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Bach DS, Deeb GM, Bolling SF. Accuracy of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for estimating the severity of functional mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76(7):508–12.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, Rayatzadeh H, Alaeddini F. A prospective study of predicting factors in ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence after ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(3):745–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Yousefnia MA, Mandegar MH, Roshanali F, Alaeddini F, Amouzadeh F. Papillary muscle repositioning in mitral valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(3):958–63.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Lehmann KG, Francis CK, Dodge HT. Mitral regurgitation in early myocardial infarction. Incidence, clinical detection, and prognostic implications. TIMI Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(1):10–7.CrossRef
23.
Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, Smith SC, Jr., Gersh BJ, Basta L, et al. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96(3):827–33.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Aronson D, Goldsher N, Zukermann R, Kapeliovich M, Lessick J, Mutlak D, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation and risk of heart failure after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2362–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Fattouch K, Guccione F, Sampognaro R, Panzarella G, Corrado E, Navarra E, et al. POINT: Efficacy of adding mitral valve restrictive annuloplasty to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138(2):278–85.PubMedCrossRef
26.
LaPar DJ, Kron IL. Should all ischemic mitral regurgitation be repaired? When should we replace? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26(2):113–7.
27.
Ghoreishi M, Dawood M, Stauffer CE, Gammie JS. Mitral regurgitation: current trends in diagnosis and management. Hosp Pract (Minneap). 2011;39(1):181–92.
28.
Mandegar MH, Roshanali F, Yousefnia MA, Marzban M. Papillary muscle approximation combined with ventriculoplasty in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and functional mitral regurgitation: effects on mitral valve and LV shape. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006;5(2):81–4.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, Alaeddini F, Wann S. Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography to predict reversibility of mitral regurgitation with CABG. Echocardiography. 2006;23(1):31–7.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Rao C, Murphy MO, Saso S, Pandis D, Grapsa J, Nihoyannopoulos P, et al. Mitral valve repair or replacement for ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a systematic review. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20(9):555–65.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, Hiro SP, Duran CM. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11(1):11–8; discussion 8–9.PubMed
32.
Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, Hardy BG, Bollen BA, Duran CM, et al. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II85–90.
33.
Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M, Gaeta F, Iaco AL, D’Alessandro S, et al. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(4):1146–52; discussion 52–3.
34.
Messas E, Pouzet B, Touchot B, Guerrero JL, Vlahakes GJ, Desnos M, et al. Efficacy of chordal cutting to relieve chronic persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2003;108 Suppl 1:II111–5.PubMed
35.
Alfieri O, Maisano F, De Bonis M, Stefano PL, Torracca L, Oppizzi M, et al. The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(4):674–81.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(2):600–1.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Miller DC. Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux–to repair or to replace? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1059–62.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
When to repair ischemic mitral valve regurgitation? An algorithmic approach
verfasst von
F. Roshanali, MD
A. Vedadian, MD
S. Shoar, MD
S. Sandoughdaran, MD
M. Naderan
M. H. Mandegar, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2013
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-013-0197-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Surgery spring sounds: topic justifies

  • Editorial

Approach to the lower body after massive weight loss: the Innsbruck experience with abdomino-torso and thigh-contouring after massive weight loss

  • Main Topic

Selected commentary to “Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease”

  • Selected Commentary

Approach to the upper body after massive weight loss

  • Main Topic

Examining and choosing patients for body contouring after massive weight loss

  • Main Topic

Impact of resection techniques on postoperative lung function parameters in pulmonary metastasectomy

  • Original Article