Background
In many countries around the world, there is growing concern about the shortage of primary care physicians. Steps are being taken to increase the number of primary care physicians but attracting young physicians to this career path remains a challenge [1]. Various factors determine physicians’ career choices or contribute to remaining in the profession. One of those factors is job satisfaction, which appears to play an important role [2‐9]. This study concentrated on job satisfaction.
Job satisfaction in itself is influenced by many factors. A study of 7379 primary care physicians from mainly European countries showed that feedback from colleagues, patient satisfaction, comfort and behavioral reassurance are important in increasing job satisfaction [3]. Other studies have identified factors such as variety, relationships and contact with colleagues and teaching medical students [4]. In addition, job satisfaction is considered to be positively affected by broad medical knowledge with opportunities for continuing education and skill development. Higher job satisfaction can reduce job stress and the risk of burnout. To increase job satisfaction, specific skills in managing care and communicating with patients are key requirements [2]. A patient-centered approach with a high-quality patient-physician relationship and appropriate self-care is essential [5]. The physician’s well-being and job satisfaction is also important for patients. It can influence the physician-patient relationship and patient satisfaction [6]. These aspects indicate the need to address methods to improve job satisfaction and self-care.
Anzeige
We wanted to know if self-care and guided reflection as offered by Balint work can contribute to job satisfaction in the field of general medicine. Therefore, this study focused on Balint groups and their possible effect. Balint groups were developed by Michael and Enid Balint and they led the first Balint group in the 1950s [11]. Groups of 8–12 physicians and a psychotherapist as group leader, hold regular case conferences lasting at least 2h. This group work aims to improve the awareness of psychological factors in patient care and enables the general practitioner (GP) to gain a deeper understanding of the patient’s problems and diseases [12]. In the long term, the physician’s inner attitude, approach and behavior may change, which is often recognized by the patient [13]. Some psychosomatic basic care courses include Balint work as a mandatory training. These mandatory courses were evaluated in Germany using feedback forms by 1667 doctors participating in a 10-unit course between 2004 and 2019. The long-term effects of Balint group participation were not considered, but the study resulted in good to very good ratings in terms of knowledge gain and positive impact on everyday medical practice [14]. The studies and numbers of probands are limited, but they do suggest that Balint work could have a positive impact on the GP’s job satisfaction [10].
The patient-centered approach could assist in aligning ethical and personal expectations of GPs with reality and thus increase job satisfaction and reduce the risk of burnout [15]. A cross-sectional study from Belgrade, involving 210 physicians also concluded that participating in Balint groups reduces the level of burnout compared to physicians not participating in Balint groups [16]. A qualitative study from Sweden, which conducted focus group interviews with 19 members of 4 different Balint groups, showed that stress relief and anxiety reduction were important effects. Participants mentioned a positive influence on resilience, a changed perspective on work and a better quality of life [17]. Little attention has been paid to job satisfaction so far, therefore the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of regular participation in Balint groups on the job satisfaction and self-care of GPs through expert interviews.
Methods
Study design
The study design is a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured expert interviews were conducted with GPs participating in a Balint group (Table 3). A literature review was carried out to obtain information on the interview guide. The study was conducted according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) (Table 4; [18]).
Sampling strategy
Criteria for the selection of participants were established prior to the start of the recruitment process: Participants should have worked as GPs for at least 3 years and attended Balint groups regularly for at least 1 year. These criteria were chosen to gain a broad insight into the job satisfaction and self-care and to be able to assess the long-term influences of Balint work. No more than two participants should be recruited from the same Balint group, to ensure a wider range of experiences. The selection of participants was purposive. Through the Austrian Balint Society, Balint group leaders in Austria were contacted to recruit participants for the expert interviews. To avoid bias, the group leaders were not informed about the exact topic of the study or the research question and 5 Balint group leaders passed on the contact details of the interviewer to the participants of their groups. To ensure voluntary participation, participants contacted the interviewer personally by e‑mail or telephone. During the initial contact with the participants, no information about the content of the interview was given. The participants were unknown to the interviewer prior to the interview, they were only informed that the interviewer was a medical student and 7 participants agreed to the interview after the first contact. There were no dropouts.
Anzeige
Data collection
One-to-one semi-structured expert interviews were conducted. Participants were asked to find a convenient time that did not interfere with their routine business and allowed privacy. Out of 7 interviews 6 took place online via “MS Teams” or “Zoom”, while one interview was conducted face to face. The interviews were audio and video recorded, Additional information and specifics of the interview guide were noted in handwritten form. The interviews lasted on average 20–25 min, not including the introduction and conclusion. The transcripts were anonymized using participant numbers instead of names and specific details were generalized. The original records and transcripts are kept in a password-protected file. The interviews were conducted by the first author of this paper. The first author of this paper is a female medical student with 9 years of prior experience as a nurse.
Research question
Can participation in Balint groups be recommended to improve self-care and job satisfaction among GPs?
Data analysis
The interviews were transcribed and coded by the first author. The coding software “MAXQDA” was used with a thematic analysis according to Brown and Clarke [19]. Prior to coding, the main categories were deductively derived from the literature and the interview guide. After an initial round of deductive coding, specific statements were inductively coded and assigned to the main categories. The results of the data analysis were summarized in tabular form and each main theme was described narratively. Quotes from the participants were used to supplement the themes. The results were discussed and compared with the literature findings. For the linguistic and grammatical correction of the paper, “DeepL Write” was used.
Ethical consideration and data protection
At the beginning of the interview, the participants were informed about the procedure and the purpose of the interview. The data collected were anonymized at the first possible stage, when the interviews were transcribed. For all interviews, a written informed consent form was signed by the participants. The project was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and all subsequent updates of the Declaration, with the European Commission’s “Guideline of Good Clinical Practice”, with national requirements and with the Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences in Krems. The ethics committee was contacted to confirm that ethics approval was not required as no patient or health-related data were collected, and expert data were anonymized.
Results
The analysis of the interview transcripts resulted in 8 main themes and 39 subthemes. A main theme focuses on the description of the interviewees and 7 main themes focus on the experiences and influences of Balint work. Details are given in Table 1.
Table 1
Table of main themes and subthemes
Main themes | Subthemes |
|---|---|
Description of interviewees | Professional experience in years |
Balint group participation in years | |
Job satisfaction at the time of the interview | |
Self-care at the time of the interview | |
Professional challenges and difficulties | |
Competencies learned or improved through Balint work | Communication skills |
New perspectives | |
Patient-physician relationship | |
Feedback | |
More composure | |
Changes in self-care through Balint work | Self-reflection and new perspectives |
Self-care and self-confidence | |
Less perfectionism | |
Motivation and orientation | |
Job satisfaction and Balint work | Better interaction with patients and oneself |
Career changes | |
Changes in interaction with employees | |
Empathy training | |
Reflecting on routines | |
Observation/nonverbal hints | |
Self-reflection and setting boundaries | |
Attitude change | |
Patient-centered approach | |
Conflict management | |
Difficult patients | |
Job satisfaction positively influenced | |
Job satisfaction not directly influenced | |
Balint work as burnout prophylaxis | Perceived as burnout prophylaxis |
Not perceived as burnout prophylaxis | |
Feedback and connection with colleagues | Networking and exchange |
Learning from different approaches | |
Different fields of expertise | |
Openness in a protected space | |
Possible negative experiences | Costs, time required, travel distance |
Dealing with feedback or criticism | |
No negative experiences | |
Recommendation of Balint work | Absolute recommendation |
Hospitals and institutions | |
Continuing education and training |
Description of interviewees
There were 7 participants in the interview sample. The average professional experience was more than 18 years and the average length of participation in Balint groups was more than 10 years. Participants were recruited from 4 different Austrian provinces and from 6 different Balint groups. Details are given in Table 2.
Table 2
Demographics of the participants
Variable | n |
|---|---|
All | 7 |
State | |
Lower Austria | 2 |
Upper Austria | 1 |
Salzburg | 3 |
Vienna | 1 |
Sex | |
Female | 6 |
Male | 1 |
Work experience (as primary care physician) | |
8 years | 1 |
14–15 years | 3 |
20 years | 1 |
> 30 years | 2 |
Balint group participation | |
4–7 years | 5 |
16 years | 1 |
35 years | 1 |
Of the participants 5 worked in the public sector and 2 participants worked in the private sector, 2 participants worked full-time in their own general practice from Monday to Friday (one in a large city in Austria, the other one in a more rural area), with contracts to all Austrian health insurances. Of the participants 2 worked in a group practice also with contracts to all Austrian health insurances, one of them full time and another 30 h per week with additional 10 h of private appointments. Another primary care physician working in the public sector works as a GP in a hospital and as school physician, 2 primary care physicians currently work in the private sector in their own elective general medical practice and one of them additionally works in a rehabilitation center. One of them has worked as a substitute primary care physician in the public sector for many years.
Job satisfaction at the time of the interview
Out of 7 experts 6 rated their job satisfaction as high to very high. The interviewees named the following aspects that contribute to a high level of job satisfaction: self-determined work, variety in everyday working life, daily reflection, collaboration and exchange with colleagues, opportunities for continuing education and training, working with students, being aware of one’s own needs, setting boundaries and taking breaks. The patient-physician relationship, successful patient contacts, patient-centered work, and the ability to take time for the patients were highlighted as particularly conducive to job satisfaction. One expert rated the job satisfaction as rather low. This is mainly due to structural and financial challenges.
Self-care of the interviewees at the time of the interview
One expert described self-care as very good, thanks to an ideal work-life balance and changes in the professional environment. Of the experts three described self-care as an ongoing process that has to be learned slowly and should be renewed and made conscious on a regular basis. While two experts described their self-care as in need of improvement, another expert stated that self-care is currently clearly neglected due to personal problems. Activities and ways to improve self-care mentioned by the experts include exercise, nature walks, gardening, spending time with loved ones, taking rest periods, getting enough sleep, listening to music, attending cultural events, and an overall healthy lifestyle. Experts highlighted time management and breaks between patient appointments as critical to providing quality care and mentioned that small rituals are a good way to calm down during the working day.
Professional challenges and difficulties
The experts described some important challenges and difficulties in their professional life. Time seems to be a major challenge in everyday work. Busy work schedules leave little time for breaks or to address conflicts and problems, which can have a negative impact on the patient-physician relationship, quality of care and satisfaction for both parties. Pressure situations make it difficult to attend to personal needs.
“If I have to see 100 patients in a day, I can’t deal with conflicts and problems the way I want to, and things stay open. If I have to fill in an insane amount of paperwork and have no time at all to deal with the person, these are the systemic factors that have a huge impact on the patient-physician relationship, on the quality of care, and also on patient and physician satisfaction.” (Interview 6)
Another challenge, described by some experts, is that primary care physicians work alone most of the time. The workload cannot be shared, and decisions are always made by one person alone. One expert described working alone as an advantage as it leads to self-determination.
Anzeige
Competencies learned or improved through Balint work
Some experts experienced an improvement in their communication skills, especially when it comes to engaging with patients and taking their needs seriously. One expert summarized this as “empathy training”. Another expert saw a change in the own view of the patient-physician relationship as a result of participating in Balint groups.
“It helps to listen in a different way and to take the patient’s needs very seriously, which I didn’t manage to do before. Now I can definitely engage better with patients.” (Interview 7)
In the opinion of the experts, the acceptance of positive feedback and appreciation is also trained in Balint group discussions. It teaches how to give constructive feedback and how to motivate colleagues. This increases self-confidence and thus influences the feeling of security. Broadening horizons, thinking from different perspectives and implementing new ideas and job opportunities are also mentioned as effects of Balint group participation. One expert described Balint work as “training to calm down”.
“I think sometimes it is not bad to have a different point of view, to learn to think from a different position and just to be more open.” (Interview 4)“I would consider more composure as an absolute acquisition of competence.” (Interview 1)
Changes in self-care through Balint work
Balint work improved the self-care of the experts in several ways. In summary, experts stated that it leads to a more loving and reflective approach to oneself and reduces pressure or perfectionism. It trains dealing with mistakes and self-forgiveness, setting boundaries, and taking breaks. A positive impact on self-appreciation and self-reflection was mentioned. For some experts this led to an increase in empathy and sensitivity towards patients and towards oneself. One expert pointed out that the Balint group could also be used to discuss personal or private conflicts and stresses, which also has an impact on self-care.
“It also trains my introspection in terms of self-care: When do I need a break? When do I need a moment on the terrace to take a deep breath? How do I feel after a touching or difficult conversation? It trains me to take care of myself a lot.” (Interview 3)
Job satisfaction and Balint work
Of the experts four see a definite positive influence on job satisfaction, one of them even a massive influence. A fifth expert cannot attribute the improved job satisfaction solely to Balint groups due to additional training and methods used but sees a large part in it. Another expert sees no direct effect on job satisfaction, according to this expert job satisfaction is high anyway. In contrast, the expert with the lowest job satisfaction does not see an influence of Balint group participation on job satisfaction, as working with patients is only part of the job and the main problems of dissatisfaction are more structural and financial. Nevertheless, the expert describes that a few days after the Balint group, work feels more relaxed and an open attitude improves. Overall, 5 out of 7 experts see a definite improvement in job satisfaction through regular participation in Balint groups, while 2 experts do not see job satisfaction itself directly influenced.
Anzeige
According to some experts, Balint work can change the way they care for patients and allows them to question one’s own attitude. It helps to analyze challenging situations, to reduce operational blindness and to understand personal triggers and issues. This self-reflection allows for a professional distance from the patient while still allowing for the expression of emotions. One expert stated that understanding personal nuances and issues can lead to better patient care and even prevent burnout.
“It really helped to gain security or to resolve conflicts, to see problems in a more differentiated way, to find a way to deal with patients where it might have been difficult.” (Interview 6)
One expert recalled that Balint work had led to positive developments in dealing with employees. Empathy towards colleagues and employees had changed in some cases, and it was described that one’s own frustration tolerance had become greater.
“There is a greater sense of togetherness. My own empathy towards colleagues has also changed.” (Interview 2)
Another aspect mentioned is that Balint work can help to continually reflect on personality traits and needs. In the case of one expert, the result was an increase in joy and love of the medical profession. In some cases, Balint work has led to changes in the career path, such as specialization in a particular medical field, a change in working environment, or an increased focus on psychosocial and psychosomatic approaches.
“By feeling this different quality of relationships, which can be worked out so finely in Balint groups, it has actually had a direct influence on my career.” (Interview 6)
Of the experts four addressed the issue of “difficult patients”. Case discussions and feedback from colleagues help to promote a sense of calm and approach patients with less emotional attachment and more curiosity. This can reduce the burden of difficult cases and prevent some patients from being negatively labelled when they appear on the waiting list.
“There are no more irritating or negative feelings when looking at the waiting list. Everyone is called in the same way, with the same practiced calmness.” (Interview 1)
Anzeige
Balint work as burnout prophylaxis
Out of 7 experts 6 clearly consider Balint work as a burnout prophylaxis for themselves. One expert does not see it as a burnout prophylaxis, as other methods seem to be more suitable in this case; however, according to this expert, Balint groups seem to be a good tool to reflect on job satisfaction and to become aware of personal and professional developments.
For one expert Balint group participation has a relieving effect and leads to fewer professional worries to take home, which results in a better end of the working day and increases the ability to relax. Other experts described a positive impact on factors such as handling difficult or overwhelming situations, recognizing blind spots, finding easier ways of doing things or reducing the pressure to perform. One expert sees Balint groups as the “best burnout prophylaxes available” and highlighted social togetherness, solidarity and “being seen” as positive factors.
“You know that you can put these worries elsewhere and work on them in the next Balint group session.” (Interview 3)
Feedback and connection with colleagues
Experts agreed that Balint work provides a valuable opportunity for personal and emotional exchange and a safe and confidential space for honest and open communication. The diversity of specialties in the group enables cross-disciplinary thinking and learning, which is seen as a positive development by experts. Discussing difficult patient cases and sharing experiences can improve the quality of care and normalize the experience of making mistakes and facing challenges in healthcare. The connection with colleagues was generally emphasized as a great motivating factor for regular participation in Balint groups.
“It is also pleasant to be in such a group. You feel that it is a special atmosphere or environment.” (Interview 2)
Possible negative experiences
It was mentioned that it is sometimes difficult to fit the sessions into the daily work routine or to motivate oneself after a long working day but that it is still time well spent. It was also noted that the travelling distance is very long for some. One expert pointed out, that parking fees are high because the Balint group meets in the city center.
When asked if individual Balint group sessions had a negative impact on job satisfaction, 7 out of 7 answered “no”; however, some experts pointed out aspects considered less ideal. One expert said that although it does not negatively influence job satisfaction, it sometimes has an effect on personal satisfaction because it brings situations to the surface that could have been handled better. Indirect criticism, feedback or opinions that are not in line with one’s own can lead to a temporary reduction of self-esteem but this also encourages self-reflection, according to this expert. Another expert stated that one has to be able to deal with harsher attacks or criticism if sessions do not proceed professionally. A too large or too small group size was also mentioned as less ideal.
Recommendation of Balint work
Experts concluded that Balint work should be recommended to increase self-care and job satisfaction, not only for physicians but also for other health professions and it should be included in the education as well. It should not be mandatory but should be strongly encouraged and presented in a way that is more likely to be accepted.
“I can recommend it to any physician, whether in a hospital setting or in outpatient care. I know it is only meant for physicians, but in reality any person who deals with other people would need it.” (Interview 3)
Discussion
Our interview partners very homogeneously showed relatively high job satisfaction. Their own perception made a clear connection to their longstanding participation in Balint groups. In spite of the relatively small number of participants, we formed a first hypothesis that regular participation in Balint groups may have a positive impact on job satisfaction. It appears to increase resilience and helped to accept structural or financial factors that cannot be easily changed.
This hypothesis is considered to be strengthened by the fact that participants are working in a broad variety of settings. What they all share, except for being GPs, is Balint work over a longer period of at least 1 year.
Our results are in line with studies summarized in the background in terms of job satisfaction, burnout prevention and the professional identity [15‐17]. Factors such as the training of a patient-centered view, a better handling of difficult patients, dealing with insecurity and mistakes, or an increased empathy towards colleagues [15] were mentioned by the experts as well. It should, in addition, be mentioned that the interviewees in this study also largely see participation in Balint groups as burnout prevention.
We consider our results to be relevant triggers for further research into a most important topic, including a comparison with non-participants or dropouts. Exploring a wider range of Balint groups, particularly in clinical settings and in different specialties, would be interesting to understand the impact on the work climate and job satisfaction of physicians in the outpatient and inpatient sector.
Strengths and limitations of the study
A clear limitation of the study is the small sample size, although there was data saturation on the main themes and the experts show a very long experience with Balint groups compared to other studies.
Interviewer bias can be a potential problem. The interviewer’s expectations and personal opinions can influence the atmosphere and direction of the interview. To reduce bias, an interview guide was prepared and open-ended questions were asked. Leading questions were avoided altogether and questions for clarification and control were asked. The interviewer did not participate in a Balint group more than five times in order to remain as unbiased as possible and to analyze the method from an outside perspective. This is a strength compared to studies conducted by Balint group leaders or long-term Balint group participants.
Volunteer bias should be mentioned as well. It is possible that physicians who are more satisfied are more inclined to participate in an interview than those who are generally more overworked or stressed. To reduce this, the participants were not informed about the topic of the interview. They did not know in advance that it would focus on job satisfaction and self-care.
Nevertheless, the homogeneity of the results creates interest for further research. As current research on this specific research question is limited, the comparability of the results with other studies is only possible to a certain extent.
We did not study the influence of Balint groups on coping with the particular strain working in the public sector (“primary care”) might imply. This aspect would also merit particular attention in further research.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that regular participation in Balint groups may help to improve self-care and job satisfaction in GPs. No harmful effects could be identified. Further research with larger samples, and a comparison with physicians not taking part or having dropped out of Balint groups is needed to assess the replicability of these findings on a wider scale, before general recommendations can be made.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences for supporting this study, the interviewees for their participation, Regina Magdowski and the Balint group in Krems for providing an insight into Balint work and Hans-Peter Edlhaimb, President of the Austrian Balint Society, for establishing contacts with Balint group leaders in Austria.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
K. Schweiger, B. Hofbaur and S. Rabady declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical standards
The research team guarantees that the project was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and all subsequent updates of the Declaration, with the European Commission’s “Guideline of Good Clinical Practice”, with national requirements and with the requirements of Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences in Krems. The ethics committee was contacted to confirm that ethics approval was not required as no patient or health-related data were collected and expert data were anonymized. For all interviews, an informed consent form as well as a written agreement to maintain anonymity and data protection was signed by the participants after they have been informed in detail about the study.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
